📋 Written Ability Test (WAT) Analysis Guide
🌐 Should Governments Regulate the Development of AI-Powered Autonomous Weapons
🌟 Understanding the Importance
The regulation of AI in weaponry transcends defense; it intertwines with ethics, international relations, and technology innovation. For B-school students, analyzing this topic cultivates skills in ethical decision-making and global leadership.
📚 Effective Planning and Writing
- Time Allocation: Planning (5 mins), Writing (20 mins), Review (5 mins).
- Preparation Tips:
- Gather verified data and examples.
- Understand stakeholder perspectives.
✍️ Introduction Techniques
- Contrast: “While AI in medicine saves lives, its application in autonomous weapons threatens to take them unjustly.”
- Global Treaty Reference: “The absence of treaties on autonomous weapons mirrors the pre-nuclear treaty era, with nations racing unchecked toward militarized AI.”
📑 Structuring the Essay Body
1. Achievements:
Highlight reduced military casualties and increased precision using data.
2. Challenges:
Discuss ethical issues and risks of an arms race, referencing incidents like Azerbaijan.
3. Future Outlook:
Suggest global regulations, emphasizing collaboration akin to nuclear disarmament treaties.
✅ Concluding Effectively
- Balanced Approach: “Governments must regulate AI weaponry to prevent ethical breaches while fostering innovation for peaceful applications.”
- Global Comparison: “International frameworks like the Geneva Conventions provide a roadmap for governing autonomous weapons effectively.”
📝 Sample Short Essays (100 Words Each)
1. Balanced Perspective:
“AI in autonomous weapons represents both innovation and peril. While improving battlefield efficiency, it necessitates global regulations to address ethical and security concerns. An arms race in this domain could destabilize international peace.”
2. Solution-Oriented:
“Regulating AI-powered weapons requires international collaboration akin to nuclear treaties. Governments must foster responsible innovation while ensuring adherence to humanitarian laws.”
3. Global Comparison:
“Unlike nuclear arms, AI weapons lack international treaties, raising global security risks. Countries must unite to establish ethical frameworks, drawing lessons from successful agreements in other sectors.”