📋 Written Ability Test (WAT)/Essay Analysis Guide
💡 Topic: Should Gene-Editing Technologies like CRISPR Be Regulated More Strictly?
🌟 Understanding the Topic’s Importance
CRISPR technologies impact healthcare, agriculture, and global economies, raising ethical concerns vital for future business leaders to navigate responsibly.
⏱️ Effective Planning and Writing
- ⏳ Time Allocation:
- Planning: 5 minutes
- Writing: 20 minutes
- Review: 5 minutes
- 💡 Preparation Tips: Research key cases, such as China’s embryo-editing controversies, and gather data on regulatory policies.
✍️ Introduction Techniques for Essays
- ⚖️ Contrast Approach: “While CRISPR promises to eradicate genetic diseases, it also risks exacerbating inequality and ethical dilemmas.”
- 🔑 Solution-Based Approach: “Effective regulation can harness CRISPR’s potential while safeguarding ethical boundaries.”
🧩 Structuring the Essay Body
- 🏆 Achievements:
- Highlight medical breakthroughs like curing genetic disorders.
- ⚠️ Challenges:
- Discuss ethical risks, ecological impacts, and societal inequities.
- 🌍 Future Outlook:
- Suggest international regulatory frameworks and inclusive access strategies.
📄 Concluding Effectively
- ⚖️ Balanced Perspective: “CRISPR offers unparalleled possibilities but demands robust oversight to ensure equity and safety.”
- 🌐 Global Example: “Learning from stringent EU policies can guide the ethical application of gene-editing technologies worldwide.”
📝 Sample Short Essays
⚖️ Balanced Perspective:
“Gene-editing technologies like CRISPR offer immense potential in treating genetic diseases and improving agriculture. However, strict regulation is crucial to prevent ethical and ecological risks. Global collaboration can balance innovation with safety.”
🔑 Solution-Oriented:
“Effective regulatory frameworks can maximize CRISPR’s benefits while mitigating misuse. Countries must collaborate on ethical standards to ensure equitable and safe application of this transformative technology.”
🌍 Global Comparison:
“While China leads CRISPR innovation, ethical concerns highlight the need for stricter global regulations. A balanced approach, like the EU’s precautionary principle, can guide safer applications of gene editing.”