📋 Written Ability Test (WAT) / Essay Analysis Guide: Should There Be a Global Military Force?
🌐 Understanding the Importance
The debate on establishing a global military force touches upon governance, sovereignty, and international relations—key areas for policy analysis and ethical decision-making, making it a relevant topic for B-school discussions.
📝 Effective Planning and Writing
- ⏳ Time Allocation:
- Planning: 5 minutes
- Writing: 20 minutes
- Review: 5 minutes
- 💡 Preparation Tips:
- Identify 3-4 key statistics.
- Note examples of successful and failed interventions.
💡 Introduction Techniques
- 🔄 Contrast Approach: “While NATO showcases collaborative military success, UN peacekeeping often falters—can a global military force bridge the gap?”
- 🌟 Solution-Based Introduction: “A global military force, if structured equitably, could redefine international conflict resolution.”
📚 Structuring the Essay Body
- 🏆 Achievements: Highlight successful interventions like Liberia, showcasing how coordinated military efforts have stabilized regions.
- ⚠️ Challenges: Discuss sovereignty concerns, funding disparities, and the potential misuse of power.
- 🌟 Future Outlook: Explore equitable funding models, enhanced accountability mechanisms, and transparent decision-making processes.
🔑 Concluding Effectively
- ⚖️ Balanced Perspective: “A global military force presents a transformative vision but requires robust safeguards to respect national sovereignty.”
- 🌍 Comparative Example: “While NATO’s success inspires hope, the failures of UN peacekeeping underscore the need for structural reforms.”
📄 Sample Short Essays
- ⚖️ Balanced Perspective: “A global military force could revolutionize conflict resolution, but only if sovereignty and resource disparities are addressed equitably.”
- 💡 Solution-Oriented: “By adopting GDP-linked funding and democratic oversight, a global military force can ensure fair conflict resolution.”
- 🌍 Global Comparison: “Drawing lessons from NATO and UN peacekeeping, a global force could strike the balance between efficiency and impartiality.”