๐ Written Ability Test (WAT) Analysis Guide: Should Athletes Have a Say in Sports Governance?
๐ Understanding the Topicโs Importance
The role of athletes in governance connects with B-school themes like stakeholder theory, leadership, and organizational behavior. It highlights broader concerns of inclusivity, ethical management, and leveraging direct expertise in decision-making.
๐๏ธ Effective Planning and Writing
- ๐ Time Allocation:
- Planning: 5 minutes
- Writing: 20 minutes
- Review: 5 minutes
- ๐ Structure:
- Introduction: 60 words
- Body: 350 words
- Conclusion: 60 words
๐ Introduction Techniques
- โ๏ธ Contrast Approach: “While athletes dominate the limelight during events, their voices often fade in boardrooms, questioning governance inclusivity.”
- ๐ง Solution-Based Approach: “Including athletes in governance is not just ethical but also essential for fair play and holistic development.”
๐ Structuring the Essay Body
- ๐ Achievements:
- ๐ Highlight IOCโs Athletes’ Commission as a successful example of participatory governance.
- โ๏ธ Cite national examples like Australia, where athlete inclusion improved decision-making and fairness.
- โ ๏ธ Challenges:
- โ Systemic resistance from traditional administrators fearing loss of control.
- ๐ Skill gaps, as many athletes lack governance training or organizational expertise.
- ๐ Examples of failures where poor representation led to inefficiencies or conflicts.
- ๐ฎ Future Outlook:
- โ๏ธ Advocate for structured training programs to prepare athletes for governance roles.
- ๐ค Propose balanced representation models to ensure all stakeholder views are considered.
- ๐ Emphasize the need for feedback mechanisms between athletes and administrators to foster mutual understanding.
๐ฏ Concluding Effectively
- โ๏ธ Balanced Approach: “Athlete involvement in governance is a progressive step but requires structural support and training to succeed.”
- ๐ Global Comparison Approach: “Countries like Norway and Australia demonstrate how athlete governance can drive fairness, ethical decision-making, and organizational excellence.”
๐ก Analyzing Successes and Shortcomings
- โ๏ธ Key Achievements: Enhanced policy relevance and the creation of ethical frameworks grounded in athlete welfare.
- โ Ongoing Challenges: Resistance from administrators and lack of preparedness among athletes.
- ๐ Global Context: Progressive models in Australia and the U.S. showcase how participatory governance can work effectively.
๐ Recommendations for Sustainable Progress
- ๐ Structured Training Programs: Develop dedicated governance training for athletes transitioning into administrative roles.
- ๐ค Balanced Representation Models: Include athletes as equal stakeholders alongside administrators and policymakers.
- ๐ Regular Feedback Mechanisms: Foster open communication between athletes and sports bodies to align objectives.
๐ Sample Short Essays
๐ Balanced Perspective:
“Athletesโ participation ensures governance decisions reflect on-the-ground realities. However, training and structural support are vital to maximize their impact.”
๐ ๏ธ Solution-Oriented:
“The future of sports governance lies in bridging the gap between players and policymakers through inclusive frameworks and structured training.”
๐ Global Comparison:
“Australiaโs model of athlete inclusion exemplifies how participatory governance can drive ethical and effective decision-making in sports.”
๐ Source: Compiled Analysis, 2024