Tech to MBA: SPJIMR Group Interview Journey

SPJIMR – From Tech to Management: How This Engineer Navigated SPJIMR’s Group Interviews

Candidate Profile

  • Background: Electronics & Communication Engineer
  • Work Experience: Around 2 years in a global IT services firm (cloud solutions and client operations)
  • Academics:
    • 10th Grade: 93%
    • 12th Grade: 97%
    • Undergraduate CGPA: 7.6
  • CAT Percentile: 99.32
  • Specialization Chosen: Information Management

Interview Experience at SPJIMR

SPJIMR’s selection process stood out for its unique group interview format, conducted over two rounds, each lasting approximately 45 minutes. The experience combined technical rigor with value-based and situational discussions—truly testing each candidate’s readiness for management.

💬 Group Interview 1 – Technical & Profile-Based Questions

  • Panel: 2 Interviewers, Group of 4 Candidates (All for Information Management specialization)

🔵 Panelist: Tell me about yourself.

📌 Tip: In a group setting, keep your "Tell Me About Yourself" concise, distinctive, and structured around your academic path, work exposure, and goals relevant to the specialization.

🔵 Panelist: Explain your work experience.

🔵 Panelist: Why did your client prefer a cloud solution over an on-premise database?

📌 Tip: Expect deep dives. Clarify the business rationale behind technical decisions, emphasizing scalability, cost-efficiency, and performance.

🔵 Panelist: Who is the chairman of TCS and what are his strategies for the future?

📌 Tip: Stay updated on top leadership in your company and their strategic direction. A well-rounded answer includes vision, recent actions, and industry impact.

🔵 Panelist: What are TCS's current revenue and market capitalization?

📌 Tip: Having current financials of your employer or domain-leading companies shows seriousness. Know your firm like a portfolio manager.

🔵 Panelist: Discuss the BFSI vertical at TCS and its contribution to revenue.

📌 Tip: Demonstrating domain knowledge (like BFSI) makes you stand out in a group. Use numbers if available and connect it to your role if possible.
  • Outcome: All 4 candidates in this round were selected for the next phase.

💬 Group Interview 2 – Ethics, Opinions & Decision Making

  • Panel: 2 Interviewers, Group of 4 Candidates (From Different Specializations)

🔵 Panelist: Should the whole group be penalized if one member makes a mistake?

📌 Tip: Such questions assess ethics and group dynamics. Pick a side, justify with real-world analogies, and be open to debate.

🔵 Panelist: What's one thing that irritates you about your parents?

📌 Tip: A surprising and personal question—answer with grace, self-reflection, and maturity. Avoid venting; focus on learning.

🔵 Panelist: Should the student body president be elected or selected?

📌 Tip: Discuss the pros and cons of each method. Highlight transparency, leadership potential, and the democratic process.

🔵 Panelist: If your group has people from different specializations, should each member stick to their specialization project?

📌 Tip: Assess feasibility vs collaboration. Emphasize interdisciplinary learning while acknowledging efficiency in skill alignment.

💬 Note: The panel actively challenged responses, pushing candidates to defend or rethink their stance—make sure to stay composed and logical.

✨ Key Takeaways for Future Aspirants

  • ✅ Know your work thoroughly. Be ready to explain the ‘why’ behind every decision.
  • ✅ Stay updated. Know financial stats, leadership, and strategies of your company.
  • ✅ Group interviews are dynamic. Adapt your communication style—assertive but not dominating.
  • ✅ Expect curveballs. Ethical dilemmas and personal questions are common. Stay thoughtful.
  • ✅ Cross-questioning is intense. Think on your feet and stay open to discussion.
📢 Disclaimer: Real Stories, Modified for Privacy
The above interview experience is based on real candidate interactions collected from various sources. To ensure privacy, some details such as location, industry specifics, and numerical figures have been altered. However, the core questions and insights remain authentic. These stories are intended for educational purposes and do not claim to represent official views of any institution. Any resemblance to actual individuals is purely coincidental.
150 150 Prabh

Leave a Reply

Start Typing