π Group Discussion Analysis Guide: Should India Ban the Use of Pesticides and Promote Organic Farming?
πΏ Introduction
Context: Pesticides have been instrumental in Indiaβs Green Revolution, enabling food security. However, concerns about health, environmental degradation, and declining soil fertility have reignited debates about moving toward organic farming.
Background: India is the fourth-largest producer of pesticides globally, but pesticide overuse has led to significant ecological and health crises, such as pesticide poisoning and contamination of water bodies.
π Quick Facts and Key Statistics
- πΎ Pesticide Consumption: India uses 0.5 kg/hectare, significantly lower than China (13 kg/hectare), but excessive use in regions like Punjab poses severe risks.
- β οΈ Health Impacts: WHO estimates ~3 million pesticide poisoning cases globally each year, many in developing nations.
- π Organic Market Growth: India’s organic product exports grew by 38% in 2023, reaching $1 billion.
- π Land Under Organic Farming: ~2.78 million hectares, the ninth-largest globally.
π€ Stakeholders and Their Roles
- ποΈ Government: Policies and subsidies for organic farming; FSSAI regulates pesticide residues.
- π± Farmers: Primary adopters of pesticide or organic practices.
- π Consumers: Driving demand for organic produce.
- π NGOs/Activists: Promoting awareness of sustainable agriculture.
- π’ Corporations: Developing eco-friendly alternatives like bio-pesticides.
π Achievements and Challenges
β¨ Achievements
- π± Sikkim: Became the first fully organic state in 2016.
- π National Program for Organic Production: Promotes certifications and exports.
- π§ͺ Bio-pesticides: Now constitute 12% of the pesticide market.
β οΈ Challenges
- πΎ Lower Yields: Organic farming has 20β30% less yield compared to conventional methods.
- π° Higher Costs: Certification and inputs for organic farming are expensive.
- π Consumer Trust: Limited confidence in organic labeling.
π Global Comparisons
- π§πΉ Bhutan: Aims to be 100% organic.
- πͺπΊ EU: Restricts pesticide use, promoting sustainable agriculture.
π Structured Arguments for Discussion
- β Supporting Stance: “Banning pesticides can improve public health, reduce environmental harm, and enhance export potential for organic produce.”
- β Opposing Stance: “Complete reliance on organic farming may jeopardize Indiaβs food security due to lower yields.”
- βοΈ Balanced Perspective: “A phased reduction in pesticide use with incentives for organic farming offers a sustainable transition path.”
π― Effective Discussion Approaches
- π Opening Approaches:
- π’ Quote: “Sikkimβs success as an organic state proves the feasibility of scaling sustainable agriculture.”
- π Data-Driven: “Indiaβs pesticide consumption is lower than global averages, but localized overuse causes significant harm.”
- π Counter-Argument Handling: Acknowledge yield concerns but present innovations like bio-fertilizers and precision farming to address them.
π Strategic Analysis of Strengths and Weaknesses
- πͺ Strengths: Health benefits, export growth, improved soil health.
- π€ Weaknesses: High input costs, lower yield, certification barriers.
- π Opportunities: Rising organic demand, global markets, bio-tech advances.
- β οΈ Threats: Food security concerns, price volatility, limited awareness.
π Connecting with B-School Applications
- π± Real-World Applications: Opportunities for agribusiness projects, policy analysis, and ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) initiatives.
- π Sample Questions:
- π¬ “How can organic farming contribute to sustainability in agriculture?”
- π¬ “Evaluate the economic feasibility of banning pesticides in India.”
- π‘ Insights for Students: Explore how agritech can bridge the yield gap and ensure scalability.

